APXM vs. RSDE
APXM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April) and RSDE (FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December) are both Defined Outcome funds. APXM is actively managed, while RSDE is passively managed. Over the past year, APXM returned 5.14% vs 14.04% for RSDE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
APXM vs. RSDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APXM achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly lower than RSDE's 6.62% return.
APXM
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSDE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APXM vs. RSDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April | 2.01% | 5.24% |
RSDE FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December | 6.62% | 13.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between APXM and RSDE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025 | 0.60 |
The correlation between APXM and RSDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APXM vs. RSDE — Risk / Return Rank
APXM
RSDE
APXM vs. RSDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December (RSDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APXM | RSDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.22 | 1.31 | +0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.62 | 2.92 | +5.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 61.17 | 10.53 | +50.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APXM vs. RSDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APXM drawdown since its inception was -0.60%, smaller than the maximum RSDE drawdown of -10.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APXM and RSDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APXM | RSDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -10.77% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.60% | -4.83% | +4.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.48% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -1.25% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 1.34% | -1.26% |
Volatility
APXM vs. RSDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM) is 0.73%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December (RSDE) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that APXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APXM | RSDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 1.79% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.04% | 4.98% | -3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21% | 8.03% | -6.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 10.93% | -9.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 10.93% | -9.58% |
APXM vs. RSDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both APXM and RSDE have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
APXM vs. RSDE - Dividend Comparison
Neither APXM nor RSDE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
APXM and RSDE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSDE has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to APXM (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APXM dropped -0.60% vs RSDE's -10.77%.
On 1-year performance, RSDE leads with 14.04% vs 5.14% for APXM. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, APXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSDE has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APXM and RSDE have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
APXM and RSDE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and FT Vest.
APXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APXM and RSDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer