APRW vs. DBO
APRW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - APRW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. APRW is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, APRW returned 7.12%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for DBO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APRW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
APRW vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APRW achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
APRW
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
APRW vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF | 6.27% | 6.18% | 11.25% | 12.38% | -2.90% | 5.58% | 5.92% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | 27.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between APRW and DBO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2020 | 0.09 |
The correlation between APRW and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
APRW vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
APRW
DBO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
APRW
DBO
-
Financial Services
APRW
DBO
Communication Services
APRW
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
APRW
DBO
-
Healthcare
APRW
DBO
-
Industrials
APRW
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
APRW
DBO
-
Energy
APRW
DBO
-
Utilities
APRW
DBO
-
Real Estate
APRW
DBO
-
Basic Materials
APRW
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRW vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
APRW
DBO
APRW vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APRW | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.23 | 1.38 | +0.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.82 | 4.44 | +12.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 86.04 | 9.02 | +77.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APRW | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.83 | 2.34 | +2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.50 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.02 | +1.13 |
Drawdowns
APRW vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRW drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRW and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRW | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -90.18% | +80.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.75% | -18.19% | +17.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.61% | -28.20% | +18.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.61% | -37.68% | +28.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -51.38% | +51.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -62.25% | +61.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.15% | 8.92% | -8.77% |
Volatility
APRW vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) is 0.60%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that APRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRW | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 12.61% | -12.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.84% | 28.20% | -26.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62% | 34.46% | -31.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.72% | 32.29% | -25.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 31.78% | -25.37% |
APRW vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
APRW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
APRW vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
APRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APRW and DBO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to APRW (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRW dropped -9.61% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.98% vs 7.12% for APRW. On fees, APRW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, APRW has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APRW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for APRW.
APRW is categorized as Options Trading, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for APRW and 0.78% for DBO.
APRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APRW and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer