APRW vs. APRQ
APRW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF) and APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. APRW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRQ.
Performance
APRW vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APRW
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- —
APRQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRW vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF | 5.57% |
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
APRW vs. APRQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
APRW
APRQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
APRW
APRQ
Financial Services
APRW
APRQ
Communication Services
APRW
APRQ
Consumer Cyclical
APRW
APRQ
Healthcare
APRW
APRQ
Industrials
APRW
APRQ
Consumer Defensive
APRW
APRQ
Energy
APRW
APRQ
Utilities
APRW
APRQ
Real Estate
APRW
APRQ
Basic Materials
APRW
APRQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRW vs. APRQ — Risk / Return Rank
APRW
APRQ
APRW vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APRW | APRQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.83 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 8.87 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.82 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 86.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APRW | APRQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | — | — |
Drawdowns
APRW vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRW drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRW and APRQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRW | APRQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | 0.00% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | 0.00% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.15% | — | — |
Volatility
APRW vs. APRQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRW | APRQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62% | 0.00% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.72% | 0.00% | +6.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 0.00% | +6.41% |
APRW vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
APRW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than APRQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
APRW vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither APRW nor APRQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, APRW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRQ.
APRW and APRQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for APRW and 0.79% for APRQ.
Find the right allocation for APRW and APRQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer