PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRQ vs. XAUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

APRQ vs. XAUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August (XAUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

APRQ vs. XAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


APRQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XAUG

1D
1.38%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
-0.84%
6M
1.02%
1Y
8.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


APRQ vs. XAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XAUG's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

APRQ vs. XAUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRQ

XAUG
XAUG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRQ vs. XAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August (XAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APRQ vs. XAUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRQXAUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

Dividends

APRQ vs. XAUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRQ nor XAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

APRQ vs. XAUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum XAUG drawdown of -8.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRQ and XAUG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


APRQXAUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-8.70%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.77%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.49%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

Volatility

APRQ vs. XAUG - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


APRQXAUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

9.24%

-9.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

6.67%

-6.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

6.67%

-6.67%