PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRQ vs. JULJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRQ vs. JULJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


APRQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JULJ

1D
0.10%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.84%
6M
2.40%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRQ vs. JULJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


APRQ vs. JULJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
APRQ
JULJ

Technology

32.0%
33.6%

Financial Services

13.7%
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
10.0%

Healthcare

10.5%
9.5%

Communication Services

9.9%
10.5%

Industrials

7.4%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
5.3%

Energy

3.2%
4.0%

Utilities

2.5%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.9%

Technology

APRQ
32.0%
JULJ
33.6%

Financial Services

APRQ
13.7%
JULJ
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

APRQ
11.6%
JULJ
10.0%

Healthcare

APRQ
10.5%
JULJ
9.5%

Communication Services

APRQ
9.9%
JULJ
10.5%

Industrials

APRQ
7.4%
JULJ
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

APRQ
5.5%
JULJ
5.3%

Energy

APRQ
3.2%
JULJ
4.0%

Utilities

APRQ
2.5%
JULJ
2.5%

Real Estate

APRQ
2.1%
JULJ
2.0%

Basic Materials

APRQ
1.7%
JULJ
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRQ vs. JULJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRQ

JULJ
JULJ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
JULJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JULJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRQ vs. JULJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APRQ vs. JULJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRQJULJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

Drawdowns

APRQ vs. JULJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum JULJ drawdown of -3.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRQ and JULJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRQJULJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-3.62%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.10%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

Volatility

APRQ vs. JULJ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRQJULJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

1.54%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

3.08%

-3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

3.08%

-3.08%

APRQ vs. JULJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APRQ and JULJ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

APRQ vs. JULJ - Dividend Comparison

APRQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JULJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%.


PositionTTM202520242023
APRQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JULJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July
5.66%5.76%5.96%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRQ and JULJ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

JULJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.00% for APRQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRQ and JULJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer