APRQ vs. CAOS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS).

APRQ and CAOS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. APRQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Mar 31, 2023. CAOS is an actively managed fund by Alpha Architect. It was launched on Aug 14, 2013.

Performance

APRQ vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

APRQ vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.46%

Returns By Period

APRQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 3.19%
• 3Y*: 5.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRQ vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

APRQ

Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April

CAOS

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF

Return for Risk

APRQ vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 41
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRQ vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APRQ	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.27	—

Dividends

APRQ vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRQ nor CAOS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

APRQ vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CAOS drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRQ and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	APRQ	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-3.60%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.80%	+0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-0.90%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	APRQ	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	4.68%	-4.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	4.37%	-4.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	4.37%	-4.37%