APRP vs. OCTQ
APRP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April) and OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. APRP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OCTQ.
Performance
APRP vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APRP
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRP vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April | 8.80% |
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRP vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank
APRP
OCTQ
APRP vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APRP | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.29 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.33 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.08 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.17 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 76.71 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APRP | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | — | — |
Drawdowns
APRP vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRP drawdown since its inception was -13.66%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRP and OCTQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRP | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.66% | 0.00% | -13.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | 0.00% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | — | — |
Volatility
APRP vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRP | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.36% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 0.00% | +4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 0.00% | +9.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 0.00% | +9.50% |
APRP vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
APRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
APRP vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither APRP nor OCTQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, APRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTQ.
APRP and OCTQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for APRP and 0.79% for OCTQ.
Find the right allocation for APRP and OCTQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer