APRJ vs. SFLR
APRJ (Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, APRJ returned 6.35%/yr vs 16.02%/yr for SFLR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APRJ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.
Performance
APRJ vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APRJ achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than SFLR's 5.55% return.
APRJ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 6.91%
- 3Y*
- 6.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRJ vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April | 3.18% | 5.71% | 6.24% | 5.38% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 5.55% | 13.29% | 19.99% | 13.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between APRJ and SFLR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023 | 0.48 |
APRJ vs. SFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
APRJ
SFLR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
APRJ
SFLR
Financial Services
APRJ
SFLR
Communication Services
APRJ
SFLR
Consumer Cyclical
APRJ
SFLR
Healthcare
APRJ
SFLR
Industrials
APRJ
SFLR
Consumer Defensive
APRJ
SFLR
Energy
APRJ
SFLR
Utilities
APRJ
SFLR
Real Estate
APRJ
SFLR
Basic Materials
APRJ
SFLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRJ vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
APRJ
SFLR
APRJ vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APRJ | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.63 | 2.20 | +2.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 9.47 | 2.98 | +6.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.20 | 1.42 | +0.78 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 34.55 | 2.87 | +31.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 103.47 | 11.73 | +91.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APRJ | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.63 | 2.20 | +2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.80 | 1.71 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
APRJ vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRJ drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRJ and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRJ | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -12.13% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | -6.79% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.68% | -12.13% | +7.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.38% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -1.74% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 1.66% | -1.59% |
Volatility
APRJ vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) is 0.47%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that APRJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRJ | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 1.87% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.14% | 6.46% | -5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 8.89% | -7.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 10.15% | -6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 10.15% | -6.52% |
APRJ vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
APRJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
APRJ vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
APRJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than SFLR's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April | 5.27% | 5.46% | 5.88% | 4.88% | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.32% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APRJ and SFLR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFLR has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to APRJ (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRJ dropped -4.68% vs SFLR's -12.13%.
On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 16.02% vs 6.35% for APRJ. On fees, APRJ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, APRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 16.02% return vs 6.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APRJ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
APRJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 0.32% for SFLR.
Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRJ and 0.89% for SFLR.
APRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APRJ and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer