APRJ vs. LLII
APRJ (Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April) and LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APRJ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while LLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. APRJ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LLII.
Performance
APRJ vs. LLII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APRJ achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than LLII's -4.28% return.
APRJ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 6.91%
- 3Y*
- 6.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLII
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 9.79%
- YTD
- -4.28%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRJ vs. LLII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April | 3.18% | 0.97% |
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | -4.28% | 19.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between APRJ and LLII is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRJ vs. LLII — Risk / Return Rank
APRJ
LLII
APRJ vs. LLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APRJ | LLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 34.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 103.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APRJ | LLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.80 | 0.71 | +1.10 |
Drawdowns
APRJ vs. LLII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRJ drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum LLII drawdown of -23.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRJ and LLII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRJ | LLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -23.96% | +19.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -6.88% | +6.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -9.28% | +9.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | — | — |
Volatility
APRJ vs. LLII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRJ | LLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 36.42% | -34.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 36.42% | -32.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 36.42% | -32.79% |
APRJ vs. LLII - Expense Ratio Comparison
APRJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than LLII's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
APRJ vs. LLII - Dividend Comparison
APRJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, less than LLII's 25.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April | 5.27% | 5.46% | 5.88% | 4.88% |
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 25.95% | 5.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APRJ and LLII have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APRJ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRJ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LLII.
LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.95%, compared with 5.27% for APRJ.
APRJ is categorized as Options Trading, while LLII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRJ and 0.99% for LLII.
Find the right allocation for APRJ and LLII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer