APRJ vs. LLII
APRJ (Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April) and LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APRJ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while LLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APRJ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LLII.
Performance
APRJ vs. LLII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APRJ achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than LLII's 2.07% return.
APRJ
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRJ vs. LLII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April | 3.20% | 0.93% |
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 2.07% | 19.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between APRJ and LLII is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRJ vs. LLII — Risk / Return Rank
APRJ
LLII
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
APRJ vs. LLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APRJ | LLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 83.93 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APRJ vs. LLII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRJ drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum LLII drawdown of -23.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRJ and LLII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRJ | LLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -23.96% | +19.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.71% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -8.63% | +8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | — | — |
Volatility
APRJ vs. LLII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRJ | LLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56% | 35.58% | -34.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.62% | 35.58% | -31.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.62% | 35.58% | -31.96% |
APRJ vs. LLII - Expense Ratio Comparison
APRJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than LLII's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
APRJ vs. LLII - Dividend Comparison
APRJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, less than LLII's 25.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April | 5.27% | 5.46% | 5.88% | 4.88% |
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 25.62% | 5.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APRJ and LLII have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APRJ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRJ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LLII.
LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.62%, compared with 5.27% for APRJ.
APRJ is categorized as Options Trading, while LLII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRJ and 0.99% for LLII.
Find the right allocation for APRJ and LLII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer