APRH vs. JULJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APRH (Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April) and JULJ (Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APRH returned 7.82% vs 5.56% for JULJ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

APRH vs. JULJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRH achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly higher than JULJ's 1.82% return.

APRH

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 4.49%
• 6M: 4.02%
• 1Y: 7.82%
• 3Y*: 7.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULJ

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRH vs. JULJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
APRH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April	4.49%	5.84%	6.91%	3.54%
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July	1.82%	5.91%	6.17%	3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between APRH and JULJ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023	0.49

The correlation between APRH and JULJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

APRH vs. JULJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	APRH	JULJ
Technology	33.6%	33.6%
Financial Services	12.4%	12.4%
Communication Services	10.5%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.0%
Healthcare	9.5%	9.5%
Industrials	8.5%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	5.3%
Energy	4.0%	4.0%
Utilities	2.5%	2.5%
Real Estate	2.0%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

APRH vs. JULJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRH

APRH Risk / Return Rank: 93
APRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
APRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
APRH Omega Ratio Rank: 97
APRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
APRH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

JULJ

JULJ Risk / Return Rank: 96
JULJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
JULJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
JULJ Omega Ratio Rank: 97
JULJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
JULJ Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRH vs. JULJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APRH	JULJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.18	3.62	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.75	6.05	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.90	1.88	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.48	9.21	-2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.02	47.78	-25.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APRH vs. JULJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRH Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is comparable to the JULJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRH and JULJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APRH	JULJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.18	3.62	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.70	1.96	-0.26

Drawdowns

APRH vs. JULJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRH drawdown since its inception was -5.87%, which is greater than JULJ's maximum drawdown of -3.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRH and JULJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	APRH	JULJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.87%	-3.62%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.21%	-0.61%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-0.02%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-0.10%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	0.12%	+0.24%

Volatility

APRH vs. JULJ - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) has a higher volatility of 0.55% compared to Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) at 0.17%. This indicates that APRH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JULJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APRH	JULJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	0.17%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.98%	0.94%	+1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47%	1.54%	+0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.56%	3.08%	+1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.56%	3.08%	+1.48%

APRH vs. JULJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APRH and JULJ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

APRH vs. JULJ - Dividend Comparison

APRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, less than JULJ's 5.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APRH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April	5.35%	5.49%	6.87%	5.90%
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July	5.66%	5.76%	5.96%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APRH and JULJ in my portfolio?

APRH and JULJ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APRH or JULJ?

APRH has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to JULJ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRH dropped -5.87% vs JULJ's -3.62%.

Which ETF is better, APRH or JULJ?

On 1-year performance, APRH leads with 7.82% vs 5.56% for JULJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, JULJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APRH or JULJ?

Over the 1-year period, APRH has performed better with a 7.82% return vs 5.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APRH or JULJ?

APRH and JULJ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APRH or JULJ?

JULJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 5.35% for APRH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JULJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 3.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.