PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APOC vs. DMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APOC vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Apr/Oct (APOC) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APOC achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than DMAX's 2.34% return.


APOC

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.04%
6M
0.42%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMAX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.86%
YTD
2.34%
6M
3.01%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APOC vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APOC and DMAX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.65

The correlation between APOC and DMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APOC vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APOC
APOC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
APOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
APOC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
APOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
APOC Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APOC vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Apr/Oct (APOC) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APOCDMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.79

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

6.01

-5.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

30.74

-26.49

APOC vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APOC Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the DMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APOC and DMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APOCDMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

3.65

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

2.14

-1.30

Drawdowns

APOC vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APOC drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APOC and DMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APOCDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-3.37%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.40%

-1.41%

-1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.07%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-0.38%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.28%

+0.49%

Volatility

APOC vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Apr/Oct (APOC) is 0.30%, while iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) has a volatility of 0.32%. This indicates that APOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APOCDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

0.32%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.39%

1.54%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

2.33%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.02%

3.40%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.02%

3.40%

-0.38%

APOC vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

APOC vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

APOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APOC and DMAX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMAX has higher volatility (0.32%) compared to APOC (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APOC dropped -4.17% vs DMAX's -3.37%.

On 1-year performance, DMAX leads with 8.46% vs 3.28% for APOC. On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DMAX has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 3.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APOC.

DMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for APOC.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APOC and 0.50% for DMAX.

DMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APOC and DMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer