PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APJX.DE vs. FVSJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APJX.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (APJX.DE) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APJX.DE achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than FVSJ.DE's 45.45% return.


APJX.DE

1D
-0.66%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
5.20%
6M
6.14%
1Y
8.80%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
10Y*

FVSJ.DE

1D
-1.75%
1M
10.08%
YTD
45.45%
6M
49.69%
1Y
73.97%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
14.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APJX.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
APJX.DE
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
5.20%5.91%11.45%0.12%-6.30%
FVSJ.DE
Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF
45.45%15.41%14.01%8.23%-8.28%

Correlation

The correlation between APJX.DE and FVSJ.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2022

0.64

The correlation between APJX.DE and FVSJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APJX.DE vs. FVSJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APJX.DE
APJX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
APJX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APJX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
APJX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
APJX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
APJX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FVSJ.DE
FVSJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FVSJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVSJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVSJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FVSJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVSJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APJX.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (APJX.DE) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APJX.DEFVSJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.64

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

6.17

-5.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

23.31

-20.43

APJX.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APJX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the FVSJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APJX.DE and FVSJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APJX.DEFVSJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

3.60

-2.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.65

-0.40

Drawdowns

APJX.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APJX.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum FVSJ.DE drawdown of -26.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APJX.DE and FVSJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APJX.DEFVSJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.95%

-26.95%

+7.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-11.93%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-21.76%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.71%

-2.76%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-5.16%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.16%

-0.11%

Volatility

APJX.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (APJX.DE) is 2.92%, while Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that APJX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVSJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APJX.DEFVSJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

9.05%

-6.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

17.69%

-7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

20.43%

-7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.89%

15.44%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.89%

17.16%

-2.27%

APJX.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

APJX.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FVSJ.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

APJX.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither APJX.DE nor FVSJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


APJX.DE and FVSJ.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FVSJ.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FVSJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for APJX.DE.

APJX.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Enhanced Focus, while FVSJ.DE tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for APJX.DE and 0.14% for FVSJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APJX.DE and FVSJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer