APIUX vs. BWG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

APIUX (Yorktown Multi-Sector Bond Fund) and BWG (BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, APIUX returned 3.31%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for BWG. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APIUX charges 1.17%/yr vs 2.66%/yr for BWG.

Performance

APIUX vs. BWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yorktown Multi-Sector Bond Fund (APIUX) and BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APIUX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than BWG's -0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, APIUX has underperformed BWG with an annualized return of 3.31%, while BWG has yielded a comparatively higher 5.11% annualized return.

APIUX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.15%
• 1Y: 5.05%
• 3Y*: 6.07%
• 5Y*: 1.38%
• 10Y*: 3.31%

BWG

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: -0.48%
• 6M: -0.84%
• 1Y: 9.63%
• 3Y*: 13.45%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: 5.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APIUX vs. BWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
APIUX Yorktown Multi-Sector Bond Fund	0.77%	6.49%	5.34%	7.10%	-12.71%	3.77%	-1.98%	15.34%	-6.75%	10.04%
BWG BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund	-0.48%	17.38%	7.31%	15.94%	-21.53%	1.34%	6.30%	30.59%	-12.14%	17.16%

Correlation

The correlation between APIUX and BWG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2012	0.42

Return for Risk

APIUX vs. BWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APIUX

APIUX Risk / Return Rank: 56
APIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
APIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
APIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
APIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
APIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

BWG

BWG Risk / Return Rank: 11
BWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
BWG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BWG Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APIUX vs. BWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yorktown Multi-Sector Bond Fund (APIUX) and BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APIUX	BWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	0.93	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	1.46	+1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.17	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	0.80	+1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.07	2.57	+8.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APIUX vs. BWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APIUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the BWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APIUX and BWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APIUX	BWG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	0.93	+1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.13	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.34	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.21	+0.03

Drawdowns

APIUX vs. BWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APIUX drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, roughly equal to the maximum BWG drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APIUX and BWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	APIUX	BWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.31%	-35.39%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.95%	-12.03%	+10.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.06%	-14.00%	+10.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.44%	-34.10%	+17.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.80%	-34.27%	+11.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-4.60%	+4.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-10.86%	+6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.49%	3.75%	-3.26%

Volatility

APIUX vs. BWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yorktown Multi-Sector Bond Fund (APIUX) is 1.05%, while BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that APIUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APIUX	BWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	2.68%	-1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.03%	8.52%	-6.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61%	10.37%	-7.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.70%	14.10%	-10.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.83%	15.01%	-10.18%

APIUX vs. BWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

APIUX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than BWG's 2.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

APIUX vs. BWG - Dividend Comparison

APIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than BWG's 12.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APIUX Yorktown Multi-Sector Bond Fund	4.14%	4.16%	4.14%	4.11%	4.35%	3.42%	4.02%	4.46%	4.60%	5.86%	6.90%	8.50%
BWG BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund	12.11%	11.47%	12.00%	11.73%	13.25%	8.20%	6.81%	6.55%	8.70%	8.35%	10.31%	16.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APIUX and BWG in my portfolio?

APIUX and BWG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APIUX or BWG?

BWG has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to APIUX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APIUX dropped -34.31% vs BWG's -35.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APIUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.