APHU vs. XTAP
APHU (T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. APHU is passively managed, while XTAP is actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APHU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
APHU vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APHU
- 1D
- -5.23%
- 1M
- -9.57%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- —
APHU vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APHU T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF | -9.09% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 11.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between APHU and XTAP is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APHU vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
APHU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTAP
APHU vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF (APHU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APHU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 10.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 57.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APHU vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APHU drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APHU and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APHU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -22.13% | -21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.56% | -0.25% | -25.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.79% | -3.39% | -15.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.32% | — |
Volatility
APHU vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APHU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.12% | 4.77% | +89.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.12% | 14.55% | +79.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.12% | 14.28% | +79.84% |
APHU vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
APHU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
APHU vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither APHU nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
APHU and XTAP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for APHU.
APHU and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for APHU and 0.79% for XTAP.
Find the right allocation for APHU and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer