APHU vs. BTCZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APHU (T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APHU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Amphenol Corporation (APH), while BTCZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by T-Rex. APHU is passively managed, while BTCZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. APHU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.

Performance

APHU vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF (APHU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

APHU

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 6.19%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCZ

• 1D: 5.28%
• 1M: 46.26%
• YTD: 32.54%
• 6M: 46.67%
• 1Y: 55.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APHU vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
APHU T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF	-9.30%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	-10.43%

Correlation

The correlation between APHU and BTCZ is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	-0.20

Return for Risk

APHU vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCZ

BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 23
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APHU vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF (APHU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APHU	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	-0.57	+0.26

Drawdowns

APHU vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APHU drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APHU and BTCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	APHU	BTCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.51%	-91.06%	+47.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.58%	-78.63%	+64.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.12%	-73.72%	+51.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	25.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	APHU	BTCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	68.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	93.73%	87.46%	+6.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.73%	97.12%	-3.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.73%	97.12%	-3.39%

APHU vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

APHU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

APHU vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

APHU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
APHU T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APHU and BTCZ in my portfolio?

APHU and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, APHU or BTCZ?

On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, APHU or BTCZ?

BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for APHU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APHU or BTCZ?

BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for APHU.

What is the main difference between APHU and BTCZ?

APHU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BTCZ is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for APHU and 0.95% for BTCZ.