PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APHFX vs. FQTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APHFX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan High Income Fund Class I (APHFX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APHFX achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 3.43% return.


APHFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.71%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*

FQTIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.38%
YTD
3.43%
6M
4.31%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APHFX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
APHFX
Artisan High Income Fund Class I
0.87%8.43%8.60%13.77%-10.93%4.09%10.22%6.47%
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
3.43%7.51%8.03%13.44%-14.39%8.51%3.68%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between APHFX and FQTIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.70

The correlation between APHFX and FQTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APHFX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APHFX
APHFX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
APHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
APHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
APHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
APHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FQTIX
FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APHFX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan High Income Fund Class I (APHFX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APHFXFQTIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

3.12

-1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.56

4.72

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.71

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

4.47

-2.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.62

23.61

-12.99

APHFX vs. FQTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APHFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the FQTIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APHFX and FQTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APHFXFQTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

3.12

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.64

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.59

+0.50

Drawdowns

APHFX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APHFX drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, smaller than the maximum FQTIX drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APHFX and FQTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APHFXFQTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.51%

-24.62%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-2.20%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.29%

-6.42%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.80%

-18.81%

+4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.12%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-4.32%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

0.42%

+0.19%

Volatility

APHFX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison

Artisan High Income Fund Class I (APHFX) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) at 0.83%. This indicates that APHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APHFXFQTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.83%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.47%

2.37%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

3.09%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

5.94%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.32%

7.72%

-2.40%

APHFX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APHFX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

APHFX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison

APHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than FQTIX's 6.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
APHFX
Artisan High Income Fund Class I
7.17%6.96%7.39%5.56%5.83%5.50%6.01%6.44%7.25%7.96%
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
6.85%5.70%7.86%7.64%8.10%7.15%6.89%5.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APHFX and FQTIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APHFX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to FQTIX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APHFX dropped -21.51% vs FQTIX's -24.62%.

FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APHFX and FQTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer