PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APHEX vs. GMAQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APHEX vs. GMAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan Sustainable Emerging Markets Fund (APHEX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APHEX achieves a 20.73% return, which is significantly lower than GMAQX's 53.39% return.


APHEX

1D
0.61%
1M
3.26%
YTD
20.73%
6M
21.43%
1Y
46.57%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
11.35%

GMAQX

1D
-0.09%
1M
6.86%
YTD
53.39%
6M
57.21%
1Y
84.71%
3Y*
33.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APHEX vs. GMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
APHEX
Artisan Sustainable Emerging Markets Fund
20.73%42.86%7.10%18.50%-28.37%-2.08%
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
53.39%32.09%0.62%27.41%-32.38%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between APHEX and GMAQX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2021

0.82

The correlation between APHEX and GMAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APHEX vs. GMAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APHEX
APHEX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
APHEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APHEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
APHEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
APHEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
APHEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GMAQX
GMAQX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GMAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APHEX vs. GMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan Sustainable Emerging Markets Fund (APHEX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APHEXGMAQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.75

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

6.14

-2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.89

21.86

-9.97

APHEX vs. GMAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APHEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the GMAQX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APHEX and GMAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APHEX vs. GMAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APHEX drawdown since its inception was -66.36%, which is greater than GMAQX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APHEX and GMAQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APHEXGMAQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.36%

-41.97%

-24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.48%

-13.77%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.59%

-19.64%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-2.89%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.79%

-16.60%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

3.86%

+0.11%

Volatility

APHEX vs. GMAQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Artisan Sustainable Emerging Markets Fund (APHEX) is 7.94%, while GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) has a volatility of 11.46%. This indicates that APHEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APHEXGMAQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.94%

11.46%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.52%

20.95%

-5.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

22.97%

-4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

17.70%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

17.70%

+0.48%

APHEX vs. GMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APHEX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GMAQX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

APHEX vs. GMAQX - Dividend Comparison

APHEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than GMAQX's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
APHEX
Artisan Sustainable Emerging Markets Fund
1.34%1.62%1.23%0.49%1.05%0.87%1.23%1.04%0.57%0.47%0.75%
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
6.15%9.43%32.28%6.76%4.94%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APHEX and GMAQX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMAQX has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to APHEX (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APHEX dropped -66.36% vs GMAQX's -41.97%.

GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APHEX and GMAQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer