SEEGX vs. MEGBX

In the year-to-date period, SEEGX achieves a 34.24% return, which is significantly higher than MEGBX's 10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SEEGX has outperformed MEGBX with an annualized return of 8.92%, while MEGBX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.30% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SEEGX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than MEGBX's 1.59% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) and MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SEEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the MEGBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEEGX and MEGBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither SEEGX nor MEGBX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum SEEGX drawdown since its inception was -64.32%, smaller than the maximum MEGBX drawdown of -72.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEEGX and MEGBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) is 5.28%, while MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX) has a volatility of 19.04%. This indicates that SEEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.