PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APDSX vs. VRTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APDSX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan Small Cap Fund Advisor Shares (APDSX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APDSX achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than VRTGX's 15.88% return.


APDSX

1D
2.34%
1M
-6.80%
6M
7.29%
YTD
12.47%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.75%

VRTGX

1D
2.66%
1M
-3.48%
6M
11.45%
YTD
15.88%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
10.75%
ALL TIME*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

APDSX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APDSX
Artisan Small Cap Fund Advisor Shares
12.47%8.61%20.61%9.51%-29.36%-8.92%61.14%40.22%2.10%19.72%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
15.88%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between APDSX and VRTGX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.91

The correlation between APDSX and VRTGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APDSX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APDSX
APDSX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
APDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
APDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
APDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
APDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APDSX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan Small Cap Fund Advisor Shares (APDSX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APDSXVRTGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.22

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.93

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

6.67

-1.00

APDSX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APDSX and VRTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APDSX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APDSX drawdown since its inception was -51.43%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APDSX and VRTGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APDSXVRTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.43%

-41.97%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.39%

-14.80%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.85%

-28.54%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.85%

-40.48%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.32%

-5.20%

-3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.04%

-10.36%

-7.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

4.28%

-0.19%

Volatility

APDSX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

Artisan Small Cap Fund Advisor Shares (APDSX) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) at 5.76%. This indicates that APDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APDSXVRTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

5.76%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.46%

17.18%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.41%

22.44%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.65%

24.70%

+2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.14%

24.56%

+1.58%

APDSX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APDSX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

APDSX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

APDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, more than VRTGX's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APDSX
Artisan Small Cap Fund Advisor Shares
7.22%8.12%10.28%0.00%0.35%12.00%5.23%7.80%20.77%16.23%0.00%0.00%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.63%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, APDSX and VRTGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

APDSX has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to VRTGX (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APDSX dropped -51.43% vs VRTGX's -41.97%.

VRTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APDSX and VRTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer