AOHY vs. SBIT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AOHY (Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). AOHY is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, AOHY returned 5.54% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.30 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AOHY charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

AOHY vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOHY achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.

AOHY

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: 1.70%
• YTD: 2.58%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.34%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.60%
• 1M: -6.04%
• 6M: 32.41%
• YTD: 39.44%
• 1Y: 98.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -42.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF	$518.47K	$498.47K	$466.80K
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	$29.57M	$32.71M	$46.48M

AOHY vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF	2.58%	7.62%	6.03%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	39.44%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AOHY and SBIT is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.30

The correlation between AOHY and SBIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.41 (1 year) to -0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AOHY vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AOHY

AOHY Risk / Return Rank: 79
AOHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
AOHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AOHY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AOHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
AOHY Martin Ratio Rank: 85

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AOHY vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOHY	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.27	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	1.95	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.23	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	2.35	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.79	5.19	+6.61

AOHY vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOHY and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AOHY vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOHY drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOHY and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOHY	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-91.35%	+87.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.37%	-47.94%	+45.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-77.87%	+77.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.34%	-69.07%	+68.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	21.67%	-21.20%

Volatility

AOHY vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) is 0.60%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that AOHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOHY	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.60%	18.09%	-17.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.53%	67.10%	-64.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.15%	88.65%	-85.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.71%	96.10%	-92.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.71%	96.10%	-92.39%

AOHY vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOHY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOHY vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

AOHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than SBIT's 4.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF	6.61%	6.53%	6.04%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	4.03%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOHY and SBIT in my portfolio?

AOHY and SBIT have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOHY or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to AOHY (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOHY dropped -4.17% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, AOHY or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 5.54% for AOHY. On fees, AOHY is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AOHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOHY or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOHY or SBIT?

AOHY is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOHY or SBIT?

AOHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 4.03% for SBIT.

What is the main difference between AOHY and SBIT?

AOHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AOHY and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AOHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.