AOCT vs. PQAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AOCT (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2026) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AOCT returned 7.29% vs 21.47% for PQAP. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.

Performance

AOCT vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2026 (AOCT) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOCT achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.

AOCT

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 2.49%
• 6M: 2.99%
• 1Y: 7.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOCT vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AOCT Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2026	2.49%	7.18%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	12.09%	14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AOCT and PQAP is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.74

The correlation between AOCT and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AOCT vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOCT

AOCT Risk / Return Rank: 89
AOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
AOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 93

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOCT vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2026 (AOCT) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOCT	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	4.86	-2.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.37	8.47	-4.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	2.20	-0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.42	15.50	-11.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.23	86.25	-62.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOCT vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOCT and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOCT	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	4.86	-2.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	1.76	-0.32

Drawdowns

AOCT vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOCT drawdown since its inception was -3.71%, smaller than the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOCT and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOCT	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-10.79%	+7.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.65%	-1.39%	-0.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.12%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.37%	-0.60%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	0.25%	+0.05%

Volatility

AOCT vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2026 (AOCT) is 0.38%, while PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that AOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOCT	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.38%	1.02%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.95%	3.09%	-1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58%	4.45%	-1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.89%	11.03%	-7.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.89%	11.03%	-7.14%

AOCT vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOCT vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

AOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
AOCT Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2026	0.00%	0.00%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOCT and PQAP in my portfolio?

AOCT and PQAP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOCT or PQAP?

PQAP has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to AOCT (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOCT dropped -3.71% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

Which ETF is better, AOCT or PQAP?

On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 21.47% vs 7.29% for AOCT. On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AOCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOCT or PQAP?

Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 21.47% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOCT or PQAP?

PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AOCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOCT or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for AOCT.

What is the main difference between AOCT and PQAP?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AOCT and 0.50% for PQAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.