PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANZGY vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ANZGY vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ANZ Group Holdings Limited (ANZGY) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANZGY achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -2.95% return.


ANZGY

1D
-1.51%
1M
-6.11%
YTD
1.86%
6M
0.81%
1Y
33.67%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
10Y*

BRK-B

1D
-1.41%
1M
0.87%
YTD
-2.95%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
0.33%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANZGY vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ANZGY
ANZ Group Holdings Limited
1.86%44.80%5.39%18.29%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-2.95%10.89%27.09%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ANZGY and BRK-B is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2023

0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between ANZGY and BRK-B has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ANZGY:

$76.38B

BRK-B:

$1.05T

EPS

ANZGY:

A$3.41

BRK-B:

$33.62

PE Ratio

ANZGY:

10.26

BRK-B:

14.51

PS Ratio

ANZGY:

1.29

BRK-B:

2.80

PB Ratio

ANZGY:

1.57

BRK-B:

1.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANZGY:

A$83.36B

BRK-B:

$375.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANZGY:

A$41.49B

BRK-B:

$94.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

ANZGY:

A$9.81B

BRK-B:

$71.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANZGY vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANZGY
ANZGY Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANZGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANZGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANZGY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ANZGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANZGY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANZGY vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ANZ Group Holdings Limited (ANZGY) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANZGYBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.02

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

0.04

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

0.07

+5.01

ANZGY vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANZGY Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANZGY and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANZGY vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANZGY drawdown since its inception was -25.20%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANZGY and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANZGYBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.20%

-53.86%

+28.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.71%

-9.42%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.20%

-14.95%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.05%

-9.63%

-5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-11.07%

+5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.64%

4.51%

+2.13%

Volatility

ANZGY vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

ANZ Group Holdings Limited (ANZGY) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.80%. This indicates that ANZGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANZGYBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

3.80%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.18%

10.53%

+8.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.70%

14.40%

+9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

17.10%

+6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.44%

19.39%

+4.05%

Dividends

ANZGY vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

ANZGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
ANZGY
ANZ Group Holdings Limited
4.72%4.36%6.22%6.51%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ANZGY vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ANZ Group Holdings Limited and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
30.93B
93.68B
(ANZGY) Total Revenue
(BRK-B) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ANZGY values in AUD, BRK-B values in USD

ANZGY vs. BRK-B - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ANZ Group Holdings Limited and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
35.6%
28.8%
Portfolio components
ANZGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ANZ Group Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 11.00B and revenue of 30.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.6%.

BRK-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.98B and revenue of 93.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

ANZGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ANZ Group Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 5.11B and revenue of 30.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

BRK-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 15.05B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

ANZGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ANZ Group Holdings Limited reported a net income of 3.58B and revenue of 30.93B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

BRK-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 10.18B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ANZGY and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANZGY has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to BRK-B (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANZGY dropped -25.20% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

ANZGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANZGY and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer