ANXU.L vs. SGLN.L
ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANXU.L returned 21.68%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for SGLN.L. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ANXU.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
ANXU.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ANXU.L is traded in USD, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANXU.L achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's -2.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ANXU.L has outperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 21.68%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.43% annualized return.
ANXU.L
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 36.71%
- 3Y*
- 26.40%
- 5Y*
- 16.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.68%
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -9.60%
- YTD
- -2.28%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 23.26%
- 3Y*
- 29.22%
- 5Y*
- 17.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
ANXU.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 16.81% | 19.86% | 26.74% | 56.50% | -33.24% | 27.99% | 48.47% | 39.48% | -1.06% | 32.58% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -2.28% | 65.25% | 26.06% | 12.89% | -0.12% | -3.71% | 23.60% | 19.23% | -1.55% | 11.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXU.L and SGLN.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.03 |
The correlation between ANXU.L and SGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANXU.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
ANXU.L
SGLN.L
ANXU.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANXU.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.19 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 1.04 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 3.17 | +8.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANXU.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -56.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANXU.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.13% | -56.74% | +21.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.01% | -22.81% | +11.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.45% | -22.81% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.13% | -22.81% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.13% | -22.81% | -12.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -20.70% | +17.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -33.01% | +27.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 7.51% | -4.35% |
Volatility
ANXU.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) is 6.29%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that ANXU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANXU.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 7.17% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 21.74% | -8.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 24.90% | -8.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 22.72% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 18.82% | +1.30% |
ANXU.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ANXU.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANXU.L nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANXU.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for ANXU.L.
ANXU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SGLN.L is Gold. ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXU.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for ANXU.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer