PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANXU.L vs. PE500.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANXU.L vs. PE500.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ANXU.L is traded in USD, while PE500.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PE500.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANXU.L achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly higher than PE500.PA's 8.56% return.


ANXU.L

1D
3.02%
1M
0.06%
YTD
16.81%
6M
18.06%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
26.40%
5Y*
16.87%
10Y*
21.68%

PE500.PA

1D
1.74%
1M
0.79%
YTD
8.56%
6M
9.88%
1Y
27.32%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXU.L vs. PE500.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
16.81%19.86%26.74%56.50%-33.24%27.99%48.47%11.99%
PE500.PA
Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
8.56%17.84%24.55%25.81%-19.35%30.95%17.47%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXU.L and PE500.PA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2019

0.83

The correlation between ANXU.L and PE500.PA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANXU.L vs. PE500.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

PE500.PA
PE500.PA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PE500.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXU.L vs. PE500.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANXU.LPE500.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.85

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.32

12.23

-0.91

ANXU.L vs. PE500.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the PE500.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANXU.L and PE500.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANXU.L vs. PE500.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, roughly equal to the maximum PE500.PA drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and PE500.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANXU.LPE500.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.13%

-34.26%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-9.45%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.45%

-20.52%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.13%

-24.42%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-1.07%

-2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-5.33%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.21%

+0.95%

Volatility

ANXU.L vs. PE500.PA - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA) at 3.40%. This indicates that ANXU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PE500.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANXU.LPE500.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

3.40%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

8.64%

+4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

11.73%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

15.96%

+4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

17.61%

+2.51%

ANXU.L vs. PE500.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PE500.PA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ANXU.L vs. PE500.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANXU.L nor PE500.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ANXU.L and PE500.PA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PE500.PA.

ANXU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PE500.PA is S&P 500. ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while PE500.PA tracks S&P 500 ESG+ Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXU.L and 0.25% for PE500.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANXU.L and PE500.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer