PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANXU.L achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly lower than ICOM.L's 24.73% return.


ANXU.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.79%
YTD
19.66%
6M
18.74%
1Y
39.57%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
17.78%
10Y*
21.70%

ICOM.L

1D
-1.26%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
24.73%
6M
22.86%
1Y
36.86%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
19.66%19.86%26.74%56.50%-33.24%27.83%47.17%40.88%-1.76%9.05%
ICOM.L
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
24.73%16.45%5.07%-8.06%14.83%27.05%-3.74%6.75%-10.19%5.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXU.L and ICOM.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017

0.19

The correlation between ANXU.L and ICOM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ANXU.L
ICOM.L

Technology

53.7%
5.6%

Communication Services

15.8%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
9.7%

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

3.1%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%
35.8%

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
17.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
5.8%

Technology

ANXU.L
53.7%
ICOM.L
5.6%

Communication Services

ANXU.L
15.8%
ICOM.L
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ANXU.L
12.2%
ICOM.L
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

ANXU.L
7.7%
ICOM.L
9.7%

Healthcare

ANXU.L
4.2%
ICOM.L

-

Industrials

ANXU.L
3.1%
ICOM.L

-

Utilities

ANXU.L
1.4%
ICOM.L

-

Basic Materials

ANXU.L
1.1%
ICOM.L
35.8%

Energy

ANXU.L
0.6%
ICOM.L

-

Financial Services

ANXU.L
0.2%
ICOM.L
17.8%

Real Estate

ANXU.L
0.1%
ICOM.L
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOM.L
ICOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ICOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANXU.LICOM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

5.22

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

12.15

+0.99

ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the ICOM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANXU.L and ICOM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANXU.LICOM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.22

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.67

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.55

+0.64

Drawdowns

ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, which is greater than ICOM.L's maximum drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and ICOM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANXU.LICOM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.13%

-33.13%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-7.18%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.45%

-11.40%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.13%

-26.74%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-5.33%

+4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-12.87%

+7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

3.09%

-0.01%

Volatility

ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) is 5.03%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that ANXU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANXU.LICOM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

5.49%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

15.09%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.91%

16.90%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

16.51%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

15.23%

+5.92%

ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOM.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANXU.L nor ICOM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ANXU.L and ICOM.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ICOM.L.

ANXU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ICOM.L is Commodities. ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while ICOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXU.L and 0.19% for ICOM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANXU.L and ICOM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer