ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L
ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and ICOM.L (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while ICOM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANXU.L returned 17.78%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for ICOM.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ANXU.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ICOM.L.
Performance
ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANXU.L achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly lower than ICOM.L's 24.73% return.
ANXU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 39.57%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.78%
- 10Y*
- 21.70%
ICOM.L
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 24.73%
- 6M
- 22.86%
- 1Y
- 36.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- —
ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 19.66% | 19.86% | 26.74% | 56.50% | -33.24% | 27.83% | 47.17% | 40.88% | -1.76% | 9.05% |
ICOM.L iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 24.73% | 16.45% | 5.07% | -8.06% | 14.83% | 27.05% | -3.74% | 6.75% | -10.19% | 5.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXU.L and ICOM.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017 | 0.19 |
The correlation between ANXU.L and ICOM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
Communication Services
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
Consumer Cyclical
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
Consumer Defensive
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
Healthcare
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
-
Industrials
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
-
Utilities
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
-
Basic Materials
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
Energy
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
-
Financial Services
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
Real Estate
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L — Risk / Return Rank
ANXU.L
ICOM.L
ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANXU.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.41 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 5.22 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 12.15 | +0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANXU.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.22 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.67 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.55 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, which is greater than ICOM.L's maximum drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and ICOM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANXU.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.13% | -33.13% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.01% | -7.18% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.45% | -11.40% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.13% | -26.74% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -5.33% | +4.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -12.87% | +7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 3.09% | -0.01% |
Volatility
ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) is 5.03%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that ANXU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANXU.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 5.49% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | 15.09% | -3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 16.90% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 16.51% | +4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 15.23% | +5.92% |
ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOM.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ANXU.L vs. ICOM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANXU.L nor ICOM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANXU.L and ICOM.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ICOM.L.
ANXU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ICOM.L is Commodities. ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while ICOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXU.L and 0.19% for ICOM.L.
Find the right allocation for ANXU.L and ICOM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer