PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANXU.L vs. CW8U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANXU.L vs. CW8U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANXU.L achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly higher than CW8U.L's 8.47% return.


ANXU.L

1D
3.02%
1M
0.06%
YTD
16.81%
6M
18.06%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
26.40%
5Y*
16.87%
10Y*
21.68%

CW8U.L

1D
2.31%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
8.47%
6M
9.69%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXU.L vs. CW8U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
16.81%19.86%26.74%56.50%-33.24%27.99%48.47%39.48%-3.34%
CW8U.L
Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD
8.47%20.32%19.03%24.06%-18.23%22.09%15.78%28.00%-9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXU.L and CW8U.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2018

0.86

The correlation between ANXU.L and CW8U.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

ANXU.L vs. CW8U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ANXU.L
CW8U.L

Technology

53.7%
28.3%

Communication Services

15.8%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
5.2%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.8%

Industrials

3.1%
11.4%

Utilities

1.4%
2.7%

Basic Materials

1.1%
3.3%

Energy

0.6%
4.2%

Financial Services

0.2%
15.7%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

ANXU.L
53.7%
CW8U.L
28.3%

Communication Services

ANXU.L
15.8%
CW8U.L
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ANXU.L
12.2%
CW8U.L
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

ANXU.L
7.7%
CW8U.L
5.2%

Healthcare

ANXU.L
4.2%
CW8U.L
8.8%

Industrials

ANXU.L
3.1%
CW8U.L
11.4%

Utilities

ANXU.L
1.4%
CW8U.L
2.7%

Basic Materials

ANXU.L
1.1%
CW8U.L
3.3%

Energy

ANXU.L
0.6%
CW8U.L
4.2%

Financial Services

ANXU.L
0.2%
CW8U.L
15.7%

Real Estate

ANXU.L
0.1%
CW8U.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANXU.L vs. CW8U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CW8U.L
CW8U.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CW8U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXU.L vs. CW8U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANXU.LCW8U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.70

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.32

11.32

0.00

ANXU.L vs. CW8U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the CW8U.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANXU.L and CW8U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANXU.L vs. CW8U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, roughly equal to the maximum CW8U.L drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and CW8U.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANXU.LCW8U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.13%

-34.10%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-8.48%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.45%

-17.26%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.13%

-25.79%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-1.62%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-5.03%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.03%

+1.13%

Volatility

ANXU.L vs. CW8U.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L) at 4.07%. This indicates that ANXU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW8U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANXU.LCW8U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

4.07%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

9.57%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

12.18%

+4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

15.68%

+5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

16.77%

+3.35%

ANXU.L vs. CW8U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CW8U.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANXU.L vs. CW8U.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANXU.L nor CW8U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ANXU.L and CW8U.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CW8U.L.

ANXU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CW8U.L is Global Equities. ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while CW8U.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXU.L and 0.28% for CW8U.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANXU.L and CW8U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer