ANXU.L vs. CW8G.L
ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and CW8G.L (Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while CW8G.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANXU.L returned 21.70%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for CW8G.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANXU.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CW8G.L.
Performance
ANXU.L vs. CW8G.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ANXU.L is traded in USD, while CW8G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CW8G.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANXU.L achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than CW8G.L's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ANXU.L has outperformed CW8G.L with an annualized return of 21.70%, while CW8G.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.86% annualized return.
ANXU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 39.57%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.78%
- 10Y*
- 21.70%
CW8G.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 25.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
ANXU.L vs. CW8G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 19.66% | 19.86% | 26.74% | 56.50% | -33.24% | 27.83% | 47.17% | 40.88% | -1.76% | 32.21% |
CW8G.L Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD | 9.70% | 20.57% | 18.93% | 23.48% | -18.24% | 22.46% | 15.31% | 28.54% | -9.85% | 22.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXU.L and CW8G.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ANXU.L and CW8G.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
ANXU.L vs. CW8G.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Communication Services
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Consumer Cyclical
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Consumer Defensive
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Healthcare
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Industrials
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Utilities
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Basic Materials
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Energy
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Financial Services
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Real Estate
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANXU.L vs. CW8G.L — Risk / Return Rank
ANXU.L
CW8G.L
ANXU.L vs. CW8G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANXU.L | CW8G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.41 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 2.93 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 12.76 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANXU.L | CW8G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.31 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.76 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.17 | 0.83 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.88 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
ANXU.L vs. CW8G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, roughly equal to the maximum CW8G.L drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and CW8G.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANXU.L | CW8G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.13% | -33.66% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.01% | -8.70% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.45% | -17.79% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.13% | -26.67% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.13% | -33.66% | -1.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.45% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -4.50% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.00% | +1.08% |
Volatility
ANXU.L vs. CW8G.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that ANXU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW8G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANXU.L | CW8G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 2.78% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | 8.51% | +3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 11.04% | +4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 15.25% | +5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 15.65% | +5.50% |
ANXU.L vs. CW8G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CW8G.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANXU.L vs. CW8G.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANXU.L nor CW8G.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANXU.L and CW8G.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CW8G.L.
ANXU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CW8G.L is Global Equities. ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while CW8G.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXU.L and 0.28% for CW8G.L.
Find the right allocation for ANXU.L and CW8G.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer