ANXU.L vs. CSWG.L
ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and CSWG.L (Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF) are both exchange-traded funds - ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while CSWG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Switzerland NR CHF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANXU.L returned 22.19%/yr vs 7.48%/yr for CSWG.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ANXU.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CSWG.L.
Performance
ANXU.L vs. CSWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ANXU.L is traded in USD, while CSWG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSWG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANXU.L achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly higher than CSWG.L's 7.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ANXU.L has outperformed CSWG.L with an annualized return of 22.19%, while CSWG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
ANXU.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 15.62%
- 6M
- 14.93%
- 1Y
- 32.60%
- 3Y*
- 26.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- 22.19%
CSWG.L
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 20.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
ANXU.L vs. CSWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 15.62% | 19.86% | 26.74% | 56.50% | -33.24% | 27.99% | 48.47% | 39.48% | -1.06% | 32.58% |
CSWG.L Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF | 7.48% | 32.68% | -2.25% | 14.29% | -17.39% | 18.68% | 11.09% | 31.97% | -30.77% | 28.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXU.L and CSWG.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2010 | 0.46 |
The correlation between ANXU.L and CSWG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ANXU.L vs. CSWG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Communication Services
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Consumer Defensive
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Healthcare
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Industrials
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Utilities
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Basic Materials
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Energy
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Financial Services
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Real Estate
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANXU.L vs. CSWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ANXU.L
CSWG.L
ANXU.L vs. CSWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANXU.L | CSWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 1.55 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.19 | 4.81 | +5.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANXU.L vs. CSWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, smaller than the maximum CSWG.L drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and CSWG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANXU.L | CSWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.13% | -39.15% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.01% | -13.43% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.45% | -13.43% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.13% | -29.05% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.13% | -37.80% | +2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -1.47% | -2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -11.75% | +6.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 4.33% | -1.14% |
Volatility
ANXU.L vs. CSWG.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L) at 4.15%. This indicates that ANXU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANXU.L | CSWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 4.15% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 11.81% | +1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.79% | 14.69% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 15.69% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.11% | 17.72% | +2.39% |
ANXU.L vs. CSWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CSWG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ANXU.L vs. CSWG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANXU.L nor CSWG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANXU.L and CSWG.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CSWG.L.
ANXU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CSWG.L is Europe Equities. ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while CSWG.L tracks MSCI Switzerland NR CHF. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXU.L and 0.25% for CSWG.L.
Find the right allocation for ANXU.L and CSWG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer