ANXU.L vs. 500U.L
ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and 500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while 500U.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANXU.L returned 21.70%/yr vs 15.69%/yr for 500U.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANXU.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 500U.L.
Performance
ANXU.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANXU.L achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than 500U.L's 10.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ANXU.L has outperformed 500U.L with an annualized return of 21.70%, while 500U.L has yielded a comparatively lower 15.69% annualized return.
ANXU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 39.57%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.78%
- 10Y*
- 21.70%
500U.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
ANXU.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 19.66% | 19.86% | 26.74% | 56.50% | -33.24% | 27.83% | 47.17% | 40.88% | -1.76% | 32.21% |
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.41% | 17.98% | 24.83% | 26.85% | -19.06% | 30.19% | 18.05% | 32.02% | -5.58% | 21.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXU.L and 500U.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2011 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, ANXU.L and 500U.L have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ANXU.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ANXU.L
500U.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
ANXU.L
500U.L
Communication Services
ANXU.L
500U.L
Consumer Cyclical
ANXU.L
500U.L
Consumer Defensive
ANXU.L
500U.L
Healthcare
ANXU.L
500U.L
Industrials
ANXU.L
500U.L
Utilities
ANXU.L
500U.L
Basic Materials
ANXU.L
500U.L
Energy
ANXU.L
500U.L
Financial Services
ANXU.L
500U.L
Real Estate
ANXU.L
500U.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANXU.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank
ANXU.L
500U.L
ANXU.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANXU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.34 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 14.61 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANXU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.41 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.88 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.17 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
ANXU.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, roughly equal to the maximum 500U.L drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and 500U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANXU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.13% | -34.04% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.01% | -8.34% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.45% | -18.29% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.13% | -24.22% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.13% | -34.04% | -1.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.51% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -4.73% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 1.91% | +1.17% |
Volatility
ANXU.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) at 3.21%. This indicates that ANXU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANXU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 3.21% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | 8.54% | +3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 11.57% | +4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 15.79% | +5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 18.26% | +2.89% |
ANXU.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ANXU.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANXU.L nor 500U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ANXU.L and 500U.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500U.L.
ANXU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while 500U.L is S&P 500. ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXU.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.
Find the right allocation for ANXU.L and 500U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer