PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ANXG.L vs. NASD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ANXG.L vs. NASD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and NASD.L (Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Amundi tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANXG.L returned 19.03%/yr vs 19.06%/yr for NASD.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ANXG.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NASD.L.

Performance

ANXG.L vs. NASD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ANXG.L is traded in GBp, while NASD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NASD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ANXG.L having a 19.88% return and NASD.L slightly higher at 20.21%.

ANXG.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
9.65%
YTD
19.88%
6M
18.47%
1Y
41.85%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
19.03%
10Y*
22.61%

NASD.L

1D
-0.74%
1M
9.56%
YTD
20.21%
6M
18.36%
1Y
41.85%
3Y*
24.98%
5Y*
19.06%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXG.L vs. NASD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ANXG.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD		19.88%11.70%28.70%48.00%-25.42%29.85%43.37%34.20%-3.29%
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD		20.21%11.33%29.03%48.58%-25.47%29.46%44.11%32.84%-3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXG.L and NASD.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018

0.94

The correlation between ANXG.L and NASD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ANXG.L vs. NASD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ANXG.L
NASD.L

Technology

53.7%
53.7%

Communication Services

15.8%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
7.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.2%

Industrials

3.1%
3.1%

Utilities

1.4%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.1%

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

ANXG.L
53.7%
NASD.L
53.7%

Communication Services

ANXG.L
15.8%
NASD.L
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ANXG.L
12.2%
NASD.L
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

ANXG.L
7.7%
NASD.L
7.7%

Healthcare

ANXG.L
4.2%
NASD.L
4.2%

Industrials

ANXG.L
3.1%
NASD.L
3.1%

Utilities

ANXG.L
1.4%
NASD.L
1.4%

Basic Materials

ANXG.L
1.1%
NASD.L
1.1%

Energy

ANXG.L
0.6%
NASD.L
0.6%

Financial Services

ANXG.L
0.2%
NASD.L
0.2%

Real Estate

ANXG.L
0.1%
NASD.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD

Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD

Often compared with ANXG.L:
ANXG.L vs. QQQANXG.L vs. USTANXG.L vs. EQQQ.LANXG.L vs. LGEN.LANXG.L vs. AEDAXANXG.L vs. JUP.LANXG.L vs. EQQQ.DE
Often compared with NASD.L:
NASD.L vs. AAPLNASD.L vs. TSLANASD.L vs. AIAI.LNASD.L vs. MWRD.LNASD.L vs. SUSW.LNASD.L vs. METANASD.L vs. NVDA

Return for Risk

ANXG.L vs. NASD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ANXG.L
ANXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
NASD.L
NASD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NASD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NASD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXG.L vs. NASD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ANXG.LNASD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.85
2.63

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.67
3.47

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.78

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

10.71

+0.24

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANXG.L vs. NASD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the NASD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANXG.L and NASD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ANXG.LNASD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.63

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.95

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

1.00

+0.18

Drawdowns

ANXG.L vs. NASD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANXG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, roughly equal to the maximum NASD.L drawdown of -27.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXG.L and NASD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ANXG.LNASD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.69%

-27.57%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-11.03%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.54%

-24.53%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.69%

-27.57%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.69%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.74%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-6.23%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

3.90%

-0.09%

Volatility

ANXG.L vs. NASD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) is 4.14%, while Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that ANXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ANXG.LNASD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.94%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

11.51%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

15.82%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

20.06%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.31%

20.84%

-1.53%

ANXG.L vs. NASD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXG.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than NASD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANXG.L vs. NASD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANXG.L nor NASD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ANXG.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.66%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

ANXG.L and NASD.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NASD.L.

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXG.L and 0.30% for NASD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANXG.L and NASD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer