ANXG.L vs. IUMO.L
ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and IUMO.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ANXG.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while IUMO.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANXG.L returned 19.03%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for IUMO.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANXG.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUMO.L.
Performance
ANXG.L vs. IUMO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ANXG.L is traded in GBp, while IUMO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUMO.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANXG.L achieves a 19.88% return, which is significantly lower than IUMO.L's 30.05% return.
ANXG.L
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.47%
- 1Y
- 41.85%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 19.03%
- 10Y*
- 22.61%
IUMO.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 13.08%
- YTD
- 30.05%
- 6M
- 28.85%
- 1Y
- 40.72%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- —
ANXG.L vs. IUMO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 19.88% | 11.70% | 28.70% | 48.00% | -25.42% | 29.85% | 43.37% | 34.20% | 4.47% | 20.19% |
IUMO.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc | 30.05% | 9.75% | 33.79% | 4.34% | -8.42% | 13.67% | 24.39% | 24.43% | 1.91% | 25.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXG.L and IUMO.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2016 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ANXG.L and IUMO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
ANXG.L vs. IUMO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Communication Services
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Consumer Cyclical
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Consumer Defensive
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Healthcare
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Industrials
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Utilities
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Basic Materials
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Energy
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Financial Services
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Real Estate
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANXG.L vs. IUMO.L — Risk / Return Rank
ANXG.L
IUMO.L
ANXG.L vs. IUMO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANXG.L | IUMO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.38 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 4.36 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 13.64 | -2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANXG.L | IUMO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.13 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.80 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.92 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
ANXG.L vs. IUMO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, which is greater than IUMO.L's maximum drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXG.L and IUMO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANXG.L | IUMO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.69% | -25.81% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -9.26% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.54% | -22.10% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.69% | -24.52% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -1.94% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -7.00% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 2.97% | +0.84% |
Volatility
ANXG.L vs. IUMO.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) is 4.14%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that ANXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUMO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANXG.L | IUMO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 8.23% | -4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 16.02% | -5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 18.92% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 19.17% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 20.35% | -1.04% |
ANXG.L vs. IUMO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXG.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IUMO.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ANXG.L vs. IUMO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANXG.L nor IUMO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANXG.L and IUMO.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUMO.L.
ANXG.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IUMO.L is Momentum. ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while IUMO.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXG.L and 0.20% for IUMO.L.
Find the right allocation for ANXG.L and IUMO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer