PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and EQQU.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Amundi and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANXG.L returned 18.82%/yr vs 22.08%/yr for EQQU.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ANXG.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQU.L.

Performance

ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ANXG.L is traded in GBp, while EQQU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQQU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ANXG.L having a 17.71% return and EQQU.L slightly higher at 17.93%. Over the past 10 years, ANXG.L has underperformed EQQU.L with an annualized return of 18.82%, while EQQU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.08% annualized return.

ANXG.L

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
17.71%
6M
17.46%
1Y
36.47%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
17.15%
10Y*
18.82%

EQQU.L

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
17.93%
6M
17.51%
1Y
37.10%
3Y*
24.37%
5Y*
16.95%
10Y*
22.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANXG.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD		17.71%11.70%28.70%48.00%-25.42%29.85%43.37%34.20%-22.02%32.58%
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		17.93%11.22%28.75%48.45%-25.54%29.16%43.97%32.77%4.80%20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXG.L and EQQU.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015

0.81

The correlation between ANXG.L and EQQU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.96 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ANXG.L
EQQU.L

Technology

58.5%
59.0%

Communication Services

14.3%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
6.8%

Healthcare

3.7%
3.8%

Industrials

2.8%
2.9%

Utilities

1.2%
1.2%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.1%

Energy

0.5%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

ANXG.L
58.5%
EQQU.L
59.0%

Communication Services

ANXG.L
14.3%
EQQU.L
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ANXG.L
11.4%
EQQU.L
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

ANXG.L
6.4%
EQQU.L
6.8%

Healthcare

ANXG.L
3.7%
EQQU.L
3.8%

Industrials

ANXG.L
2.8%
EQQU.L
2.9%

Utilities

ANXG.L
1.2%
EQQU.L
1.2%

Basic Materials

ANXG.L
1.0%
EQQU.L
1.1%

Energy

ANXG.L
0.5%
EQQU.L
0.5%

Financial Services

ANXG.L
0.2%
EQQU.L
0.2%

Real Estate

ANXG.L
0.1%
EQQU.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with ANXG.L:
ANXG.L vs. QQQANXG.L vs. USTANXG.L vs. EQQQ.LANXG.L vs. AEDAXANXG.L vs. LGEN.LANXG.L vs. JUP.LANXG.L vs. EQQQ.DE
Often compared with EQQU.L:
EQQU.L vs. EQQQ.LEQQU.L vs. CNDX.LEQQU.L vs. VUAA.LEQQU.L vs. SMHEQQU.L vs. QQQEQQU.L vs. CNX1.LEQQU.L vs. XLK

Return for Risk

ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ANXG.L
ANXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
EQQU.L
EQQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ANXG.LEQQU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.30
2.21

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.07
3.03

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.32

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

9.23

+0.25

ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANXG.L and EQQU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANXG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.00%, which is greater than EQQU.L's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXG.L and EQQU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ANXG.LEQQU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.00%

-27.75%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-11.12%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.54%

-24.26%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.69%

-27.75%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.00%

-27.75%

-5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-3.05%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-5.32%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

4.01%

-0.18%

Volatility

ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) have volatilities of 6.32% and 6.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ANXG.LEQQU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

6.31%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

12.83%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

16.68%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

20.18%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

20.09%

+1.02%

ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXG.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANXG.L vs. EQQU.L - Dividend Comparison

ANXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANXG.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.26%0.39%0.55%0.65%0.64%0.82%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.95, ANXG.L and EQQU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQU.L.

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXG.L and 0.30% for EQQU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANXG.L and EQQU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer