ANV vs. PEPS
ANV (GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANV charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
ANV vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ANV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PEPS
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 22.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.54%
ANV vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ANV GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF | 7.35% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANV and PEPS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANV vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
ANV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PEPS
ANV vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF (ANV) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANV | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANV vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANV drawdown since its inception was -2.82%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANV and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANV | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -21.26% | +18.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -1.79% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -2.69% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.22% | — |
Volatility
ANV vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANV | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.30% | 13.90% | -3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 18.13% | -7.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 18.13% | -7.83% |
ANV vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANV has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANV vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
ANV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, more than PEPS's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ANV GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF | 6.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.93% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANV and PEPS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for ANV.
ANV has the higher dividend yield at 6.98%, compared with 0.93% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for ANV and 0.10% for PEPS.
Find the right allocation for ANV and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer