ANTA vs. GLD
ANTA (Antalpha Platform Holding Co) is a stock, while GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past year, ANTA returned -73.85% vs 20.20% for GLD. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ANTA vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANTA achieves a -65.68% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's -6.25% return.
ANTA
- 1D
- -4.65%
- 1M
- -43.39%
- 6M
- -67.05%
- YTD
- -65.68%
- 1Y
- -73.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -69.26%
GLD
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- 6M
- -16.50%
- YTD
- -6.25%
- 1Y
- 20.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.22%
- 5Y*
- 16.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $22.01K | $19.95K | $21.29K | |
| $2.38B | $2.40B | $2.72B |
ANTA vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ANTA Antalpha Platform Holding Co | -65.68% | -30.55% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -6.25% | 32.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANTA and GLD is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANTA vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
ANTA
GLD
ANTA vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antalpha Platform Holding Co (ANTA) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANTA | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.17 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 0.86 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.01 | 1.86 | -3.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANTA vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANTA drawdown since its inception was -81.37%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANTA and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANTA | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.37% | -45.56% | -35.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.48% | -26.40% | -51.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.37% | -25.08% | -56.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.85% | -16.21% | -24.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.82% | 12.18% | +24.64% |
Volatility
ANTA vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Antalpha Platform Holding Co (ANTA) has a higher volatility of 17.09% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 6.40%. This indicates that ANTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANTA | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.09% | 6.40% | +10.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.80% | 23.52% | +37.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.50% | 28.13% | +46.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.44% | 18.49% | +64.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.44% | 16.14% | +67.30% |
Dividends
ANTA vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANTA nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANTA and GLD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANTA has higher volatility (17.09%) compared to GLD (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANTA dropped -81.37% vs GLD's -45.56%.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANTA and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer