PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANRJ.L vs. SP5L.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANRJ.L vs. SP5L.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ANRJ.L is traded in GBp, while SP5L.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SP5L.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANRJ.L achieves a 24.66% return, which is significantly higher than SP5L.L's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ANRJ.L has outperformed SP5L.L with an annualized return of 15.38%, while SP5L.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.61% annualized return.


ANRJ.L

1D
-0.51%
1M
-5.76%
YTD
24.66%
6M
24.68%
1Y
61.06%
3Y*
32.49%
5Y*
27.43%
10Y*
15.38%

SP5L.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
9.53%
6M
9.69%
1Y
26.05%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANRJ.L vs. SP5L.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANRJ.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
24.66%43.26%10.68%9.79%44.73%26.52%-27.94%3.65%0.61%9.59%
SP5L.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc
9.53%9.50%27.60%19.99%-8.84%31.19%13.92%26.93%1.00%-5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ANRJ.L and SP5L.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014

0.38

The correlation between ANRJ.L and SP5L.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (5 years) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANRJ.L vs. SP5L.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ANRJ.L
SP5L.L

Industrials

42.2%
7.8%

Basic Materials

26.7%
1.7%

Utilities

22.2%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
9.9%

Technology

1.5%
39.0%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.1%

Financial Services

-

11.1%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Industrials

ANRJ.L
42.2%
SP5L.L
7.8%

Basic Materials

ANRJ.L
26.7%
SP5L.L
1.7%

Utilities

ANRJ.L
22.2%
SP5L.L
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ANRJ.L
7.4%
SP5L.L
9.9%

Technology

ANRJ.L
1.5%
SP5L.L
39.0%

Communication Services

ANRJ.L

-

SP5L.L
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

ANRJ.L

-

SP5L.L
4.5%

Energy

ANRJ.L

-

SP5L.L
3.1%

Financial Services

ANRJ.L

-

SP5L.L
11.1%

Healthcare

ANRJ.L

-

SP5L.L
8.3%

Real Estate

ANRJ.L

-

SP5L.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANRJ.L vs. SP5L.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANRJ.L
ANRJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SP5L.L
SP5L.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANRJ.L vs. SP5L.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANRJ.LSP5L.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.44

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.60

3.60

+3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.17

12.74

+6.43

ANRJ.L vs. SP5L.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is higher than the SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANRJ.L and SP5L.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANRJ.L vs. SP5L.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANRJ.L drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, which is greater than SP5L.L's maximum drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANRJ.L and SP5L.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANRJ.LSP5L.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-25.47%

-31.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-7.20%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-21.12%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.81%

-21.12%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.08%

-25.47%

-31.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.76%

-1.54%

-4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.70%

-5.16%

-8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

2.04%

+1.14%

Volatility

ANRJ.L vs. SP5L.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) at 3.75%. This indicates that ANRJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SP5L.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANRJ.LSP5L.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

3.75%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

7.80%

+6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.95%

10.97%

+7.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

18.80%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

17.97%

+6.72%

ANRJ.L vs. SP5L.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANRJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SP5L.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ANRJ.L vs. SP5L.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANRJ.L nor SP5L.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ANRJ.L and SP5L.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ANRJ.L.

ANRJ.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while SP5L.L is S&P 500. ANRJ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ANRJ.L and 0.07% for SP5L.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANRJ.L and SP5L.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer