PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ANRJ.L is traded in GBp, while NRJL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the NRJL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANRJ.L achieves a 27.53% return, which is significantly lower than NRJL.L's 36.32% return.


ANRJ.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
27.53%
6M
25.69%
1Y
66.23%
3Y*
33.07%
5Y*
28.76%
10Y*
16.23%

NRJL.L

1D
-2.12%
1M
2.01%
YTD
36.32%
6M
132.36%
1Y
205.26%
3Y*
29.93%
5Y*
31.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ANRJ.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
27.53%43.26%10.68%9.79%44.73%26.52%40.14%
NRJL.L
Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
36.32%130.90%-11.57%-22.89%20.78%36.43%19.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ANRJ.L and NRJL.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.46

Over the past year, ANRJ.L and NRJL.L have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ANRJ.L
NRJL.L

Industrials

44.4%
46.9%

Basic Materials

25.7%
10.9%

Utilities

20.6%
31.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
0.2%

Technology

1.4%
10.4%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

ANRJ.L
44.4%
NRJL.L
46.9%

Basic Materials

ANRJ.L
25.7%
NRJL.L
10.9%

Utilities

ANRJ.L
20.6%
NRJL.L
31.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ANRJ.L
7.9%
NRJL.L
0.2%

Technology

ANRJ.L
1.4%
NRJL.L
10.4%

Communication Services

ANRJ.L

-

NRJL.L
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

ANRJ.L

-

NRJL.L
0.0%

Energy

ANRJ.L

-

NRJL.L
0.0%

Financial Services

ANRJ.L

-

NRJL.L
0.0%

Healthcare

ANRJ.L

-

NRJL.L
0.0%

Real Estate

ANRJ.L

-

NRJL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANRJ.L
ANRJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NRJL.L
NRJL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANRJ.LNRJL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

2.46

-0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.15

23.97

-15.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.14

85.38

-59.23

ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.01, which is higher than the NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANRJ.L and NRJL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANRJ.LNRJL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01

2.85

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.36

0.69

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.67

-0.18

Drawdowns

ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANRJ.L drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, which is greater than NRJL.L's maximum drawdown of -51.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANRJ.L and NRJL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANRJ.LNRJL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-51.06%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-8.51%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-40.91%

+27.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.81%

-51.06%

+31.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-2.51%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

-22.13%

+10.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.39%

+0.14%

Volatility

ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) is 6.93%, while Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that ANRJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRJL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANRJ.LNRJL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

7.66%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

54.66%

-41.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

71.66%

-55.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.21%

45.42%

-24.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

43.84%

-19.15%

ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANRJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NRJL.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Dividend Comparison

ANRJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.86%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ANRJ.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NRJL.L
Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
30.86%42.07%0.73%0.77%23.99%31.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANRJ.L and NRJL.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ANRJ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANRJ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NRJL.L.

ANRJ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while NRJL.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ANRJ.L and 0.60% for NRJL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANRJ.L and NRJL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer