ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L
ANRJ.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) and NRJL.L (Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Energy Equities funds from Amundi - ANRJ.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while NRJL.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANRJ.L returned 28.76%/yr vs 31.39%/yr for NRJL.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ANRJ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NRJL.L.
Performance
ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ANRJ.L is traded in GBp, while NRJL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the NRJL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANRJ.L achieves a 27.53% return, which is significantly lower than NRJL.L's 36.32% return.
ANRJ.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 27.53%
- 6M
- 25.69%
- 1Y
- 66.23%
- 3Y*
- 33.07%
- 5Y*
- 28.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.23%
NRJL.L
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 36.32%
- 6M
- 132.36%
- 1Y
- 205.26%
- 3Y*
- 29.93%
- 5Y*
- 31.39%
- 10Y*
- —
ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANRJ.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 27.53% | 43.26% | 10.68% | 9.79% | 44.73% | 26.52% | 40.14% |
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 36.32% | 130.90% | -11.57% | -22.89% | 20.78% | 36.43% | 19.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANRJ.L and NRJL.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, ANRJ.L and NRJL.L have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ANRJ.L
NRJL.L
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
ANRJ.L
NRJL.L
Basic Materials
ANRJ.L
NRJL.L
Utilities
ANRJ.L
NRJL.L
Consumer Cyclical
ANRJ.L
NRJL.L
Technology
ANRJ.L
NRJL.L
Communication Services
ANRJ.L
-
NRJL.L
Consumer Defensive
ANRJ.L
-
NRJL.L
Energy
ANRJ.L
-
NRJL.L
Financial Services
ANRJ.L
-
NRJL.L
Healthcare
ANRJ.L
-
NRJL.L
Real Estate
ANRJ.L
-
NRJL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L — Risk / Return Rank
ANRJ.L
NRJL.L
ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANRJ.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 2.46 | -0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.15 | 23.97 | -15.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.14 | 85.38 | -59.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANRJ.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.01 | 2.85 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.36 | 0.69 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.67 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANRJ.L drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, which is greater than NRJL.L's maximum drawdown of -51.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANRJ.L and NRJL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANRJ.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.08% | -51.06% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.08% | -8.51% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -40.91% | +27.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.81% | -51.06% | +31.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -2.51% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.86% | -22.13% | +10.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.39% | +0.14% |
Volatility
ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) is 6.93%, while Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that ANRJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRJL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANRJ.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 7.66% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.53% | 54.66% | -41.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.43% | 71.66% | -55.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 45.42% | -24.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 43.84% | -19.15% |
ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANRJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NRJL.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANRJ.L vs. NRJL.L - Dividend Comparison
ANRJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANRJ.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 30.86% | 42.07% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 23.99% | 31.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANRJ.L and NRJL.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANRJ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANRJ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NRJL.L.
ANRJ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while NRJL.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ANRJ.L and 0.60% for NRJL.L.
Find the right allocation for ANRJ.L and NRJL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer