PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANRJ.L vs. MLPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANRJ.L vs. MLPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ANRJ.L is traded in GBp, while MLPS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MLPS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANRJ.L achieves a 27.53% return, which is significantly higher than MLPS.L's 19.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ANRJ.L has outperformed MLPS.L with an annualized return of 16.23%, while MLPS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.75% annualized return.


ANRJ.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
27.53%
6M
25.69%
1Y
66.23%
3Y*
33.07%
5Y*
28.76%
10Y*
16.23%

MLPS.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
0.78%
YTD
19.25%
6M
13.78%
1Y
16.79%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
18.55%
10Y*
7.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANRJ.L vs. MLPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANRJ.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
27.53%43.26%10.68%9.79%44.73%26.52%-27.94%3.65%0.61%9.59%
MLPS.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF
19.25%-4.86%24.76%13.41%47.61%38.07%-33.22%3.12%-9.84%-16.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ANRJ.L and MLPS.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between ANRJ.L and MLPS.L has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ANRJ.L vs. MLPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ANRJ.L
MLPS.L

Industrials

44.4%
0.2%

Basic Materials

25.7%

-

Utilities

20.6%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%

-

Technology

1.4%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

96.7%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

ANRJ.L
44.4%
MLPS.L
0.2%

Basic Materials

ANRJ.L
25.7%
MLPS.L

-

Utilities

ANRJ.L
20.6%
MLPS.L
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ANRJ.L
7.9%
MLPS.L

-

Technology

ANRJ.L
1.4%
MLPS.L

-

Communication Services

ANRJ.L

-

MLPS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ANRJ.L

-

MLPS.L

-

Energy

ANRJ.L

-

MLPS.L
96.7%

Financial Services

ANRJ.L

-

MLPS.L

-

Healthcare

ANRJ.L

-

MLPS.L

-

Real Estate

ANRJ.L

-

MLPS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANRJ.L vs. MLPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANRJ.L
ANRJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPS.L
MLPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MLPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANRJ.L vs. MLPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANRJ.LMLPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.18

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.15

1.78

+6.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.14

4.21

+21.93

ANRJ.L vs. MLPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.01, which is higher than the MLPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANRJ.L and MLPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANRJ.LMLPS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01

1.05

+2.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.36

0.91

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.27

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.19

+0.30

Drawdowns

ANRJ.L vs. MLPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANRJ.L drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, smaller than the maximum MLPS.L drawdown of -75.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANRJ.L and MLPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANRJ.LMLPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-75.44%

+18.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-9.40%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-19.29%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.81%

-19.29%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.08%

-73.86%

+16.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-3.41%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

-20.16%

+8.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

3.98%

-1.45%

Volatility

ANRJ.L vs. MLPS.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) at 6.04%. This indicates that ANRJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANRJ.LMLPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

6.04%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

12.20%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

15.92%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.21%

20.28%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

28.33%

-3.64%

ANRJ.L vs. MLPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANRJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPS.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANRJ.L vs. MLPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANRJ.L nor MLPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ANRJ.L and MLPS.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ANRJ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANRJ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPS.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ANRJ.L and 0.50% for MLPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANRJ.L and MLPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer