PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANJIX vs. LIAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANJIX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus NFJ International Value Fund (ANJIX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANJIX achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 27.78% return.


ANJIX

1D
1.43%
1M
4.76%
YTD
15.09%
6M
16.18%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
7.88%

LIAGX

1D
0.64%
1M
10.09%
YTD
27.78%
6M
28.66%
1Y
41.65%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANJIX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ANJIX
Virtus NFJ International Value Fund
15.09%42.45%-2.26%10.67%-19.04%-1.36%
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
27.78%25.09%9.43%15.73%-26.63%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ANJIX and LIAGX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021

0.79

The correlation between ANJIX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANJIX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANJIX
ANJIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ANJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ANJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LIAGX
LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANJIX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus NFJ International Value Fund (ANJIX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANJIXLIAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

1.99

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

2.71

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.36

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

2.82

+1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.51

11.32

+4.19

ANJIX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANJIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANJIX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANJIXLIAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.99

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.45

-0.02

Drawdowns

ANJIX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANJIX drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANJIX and LIAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANJIXLIAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-37.87%

-24.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-14.56%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-17.11%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.87%

-13.24%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

3.62%

-1.11%

Volatility

ANJIX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus NFJ International Value Fund (ANJIX) is 5.50%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that ANJIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANJIXLIAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

8.29%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

18.01%

-5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

20.68%

-4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

18.79%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

18.79%

-1.25%

ANJIX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANJIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANJIX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

ANJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANJIX
Virtus NFJ International Value Fund
5.03%5.48%2.71%1.86%2.29%2.26%2.36%2.69%2.44%1.66%3.03%3.47%
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
0.30%0.38%0.48%0.71%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANJIX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIAGX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to ANJIX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANJIX dropped -62.46% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

ANJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANJIX and LIAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer