PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANET vs. IPKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANET vs. IPKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANET achieves a 24.58% return, which is significantly higher than IPKW's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ANET has outperformed IPKW with an annualized return of 43.12%, while IPKW has yielded a comparatively lower 11.93% annualized return.


ANET

1D
4.37%
1M
10.44%
YTD
24.58%
6M
30.84%
1Y
76.76%
3Y*
57.04%
5Y*
48.31%
10Y*
43.12%

IPKW

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
5.48%
6M
7.67%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
22.77%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANET vs. IPKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
24.58%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
5.48%45.50%10.56%15.12%-12.81%11.41%16.18%20.26%-21.59%34.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ANET and IPKW is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.38

The correlation between ANET and IPKW shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANET vs. IPKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

IPKW
IPKW Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IPKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPKW Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IPKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPKW Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANET vs. IPKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANETIPKWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.49

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

8.37

-3.17

ANET vs. IPKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANET Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the IPKW Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANET and IPKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANET vs. IPKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANET drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, which is greater than IPKW's maximum drawdown of -47.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANET and IPKW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANETIPKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.20%

-47.24%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.33%

-9.14%

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.42%

-17.77%

-32.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.42%

-32.67%

-17.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.20%

-47.24%

-4.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.15%

-3.00%

-5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-8.98%

-6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.60%

2.72%

+10.88%

Volatility

ANET vs. IPKW - Volatility Comparison

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a higher volatility of 16.62% compared to Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) at 4.33%. This indicates that ANET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANETIPKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.62%

4.33%

+12.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.79%

12.27%

+28.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.57%

14.68%

+38.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.23%

17.06%

+30.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.00%

17.90%

+27.10%

Dividends

ANET vs. IPKW - Dividend Comparison

ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.54%3.55%4.12%2.66%3.77%7.37%1.45%2.41%2.61%0.93%2.82%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANET and IPKW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to IPKW (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANET dropped -52.20% vs IPKW's -47.24%.

IPKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANET and IPKW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer