PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANEL vs. GLDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANEL vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF (ANEL) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANEL achieves a 30.41% return, which is significantly higher than GLDY's -1.92% return.


ANEL

1D
-10.20%
1M
-10.70%
YTD
30.41%
6M
32.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDY

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
-1.92%
6M
-0.12%
1Y
13.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANEL vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ANEL and GLDY is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANEL vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANEL

GLDY
GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANEL vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF (ANEL) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ANEL vs. GLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANELGLDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.57

-0.57

Drawdowns

ANEL vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANEL drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEL and GLDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANELGLDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.57%

-13.43%

-43.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.37%

-12.78%

-6.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.90%

-3.94%

-24.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

Volatility

ANEL vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANELGLDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.46%

19.87%

+87.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.46%

19.55%

+87.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.46%

19.55%

+87.91%

ANEL vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANEL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANEL vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison

ANEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.09%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ANEL and GLDY have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for ANEL.

GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 47.09%, compared with 0.00% for ANEL.

ANEL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GLDY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for ANEL and 0.99% for GLDY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANEL and GLDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer