ANEL vs. BEG
ANEL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ANEL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.
Performance
ANEL vs. BEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANEL achieves a 41.03% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 778.97% return.
ANEL
- 1D
- 5.79%
- 1M
- 23.66%
- YTD
- 41.03%
- 6M
- 41.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEG
- 1D
- 10.53%
- 1M
- 20.45%
- YTD
- 778.97%
- 6M
- 676.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANEL vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ANEL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF | 41.03% | 7.16% |
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 778.97% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANEL and BEG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANEL vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF (ANEL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANEL vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANEL drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum BEG drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEL and BEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANEL | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -59.85% | +3.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.80% | 0.00% | -12.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.50% | -16.76% | -11.74% |
Volatility
ANEL vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANEL | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.06% | 212.53% | -105.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.06% | 212.53% | -105.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.06% | 212.53% | -105.47% |
ANEL vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANEL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANEL vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANEL nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANEL and BEG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for ANEL.
ANEL and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for ANEL and 0.75% for BEG.
Find the right allocation for ANEL and BEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer