ANAU.DE vs. N1ES.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE).
ANAU.DE and N1ES.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ANAU.DE is a passively managed fund by AXA IM that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Nov 16, 2022. N1ES.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100® ESG. It was launched on Oct 25, 2021. Both ANAU.DE and N1ES.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ANAU.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ANAU.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ANAU.DE AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc | -5.44% | 20.55% | 26.51% | 13.09% |
N1ES.DE Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | -6.39% | 22.22% | 25.92% | 12.73% |
Different Trading Currencies
ANAU.DE is traded in USD, while N1ES.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the N1ES.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANAU.DE achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly higher than N1ES.DE's -6.39% return.
ANAU.DE
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -2.17%
- 1Y
- 25.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
N1ES.DE
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -3.87%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANAU.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANAU.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than N1ES.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ANAU.DE vs. N1ES.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ANAU.DE
N1ES.DE
ANAU.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANAU.DE | N1ES.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 1.73 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.56 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 9.25 | -1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANAU.DE | N1ES.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.52 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between ANAU.DE and N1ES.DE is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ANAU.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANAU.DE nor N1ES.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ANAU.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANAU.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum N1ES.DE drawdown of -34.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAU.DE and N1ES.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANAU.DE | N1ES.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.35% | -29.96% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.93% | -10.86% | -1.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.48% | -8.22% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -8.78% | +5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.73% | -0.70% |
Volatility
ANAU.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Volatility Comparison
AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE) at 5.35%. This indicates that ANAU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than N1ES.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ANAU.DE | N1ES.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 5.35% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 12.73% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 21.06% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 21.71% | -3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 21.71% | -3.31% |