AMZW vs. XDTE

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and XDTE (Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZW returned 6.63% vs 20.67% for XDTE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for XDTE.

Performance

AMZW vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than XDTE's 6.79% return.

AMZW

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -14.89%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -1.71%
• 1Y: 6.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDTE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 5.64%
• 1Y: 20.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZW vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	-0.73%	7.33%
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	6.79%	14.95%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZW and XDTE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.58

The correlation between AMZW and XDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMZW vs. XDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMZW	XDTE
Consumer Cyclical	24.5%	9.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.1%
Financial Services	-	11.1%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	7.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Technology	-	39.0%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

AMZW vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZW

AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 12
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 11

XDTE

XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 62
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZW vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZW	XDTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	1.80	-1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	2.42	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.33	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	2.70	-2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	11.78	-11.22

AMZW vs. XDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZW Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the XDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZW and XDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZW vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and XDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZW	XDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-19.09%	-7.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.79%	-7.68%	-19.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.25%	-2.52%	-15.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.19%	-2.31%	-6.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.87%	1.76%	+10.11%

Volatility

AMZW vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) has a higher volatility of 12.09% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) at 4.50%. This indicates that AMZW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZW	XDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.09%	4.50%	+7.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.19%	9.07%	+17.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.44%	11.56%	+25.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.27%	13.96%	+23.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.27%	13.96%	+23.31%

AMZW vs. XDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZW vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison

AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.16%, more than XDTE's 33.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	49.16%	25.29%	0.00%
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	33.21%	39.16%	20.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZW and XDTE in my portfolio?

AMZW and XDTE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZW or XDTE?

AMZW has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to XDTE (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZW dropped -26.79% vs XDTE's -19.09%.

Which ETF is better, AMZW or XDTE?

On 1-year performance, XDTE leads with 20.67% vs 6.63% for AMZW. On fees, XDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, XDTE has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZW or XDTE?

Over the 1-year period, XDTE has performed better with a 20.67% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZW or XDTE?

XDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZW or XDTE?

AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 49.16%, compared with 33.21% for XDTE.

What is the main difference between AMZW and XDTE?

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 0.97% for XDTE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.