PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZW vs. TSLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZW vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -16.50% return.


AMZW

1D
-0.20%
1M
-14.89%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-1.71%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLA

1D
-1.59%
1M
-11.85%
YTD
-16.50%
6M
-22.63%
1Y
10.30%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
40.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZW vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMZW
Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF
-0.73%7.33%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
-16.50%42.16%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZW and TSLA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZW vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZW
AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLA
TSLA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TSLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLA Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZW vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZWTSLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.07

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

0.35

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

0.79

-0.23

AMZW vs. TSLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZW Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is comparable to the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZW and TSLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZW vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum TSLA drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and TSLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZWTSLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.79%

-73.63%

+46.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.79%

-29.93%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.25%

-23.34%

+5.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-22.71%

+13.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.87%

13.26%

-1.39%

Volatility

AMZW vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) is 12.09%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 14.11%. This indicates that AMZW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZWTSLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.09%

14.11%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.19%

28.39%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.44%

43.96%

-6.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.27%

59.01%

-21.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.27%

59.10%

-21.83%

Dividends

AMZW vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.16%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
AMZW
Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF
49.16%25.29%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZW and TSLA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLA has higher volatility (14.11%) compared to AMZW (12.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZW dropped -26.79% vs TSLA's -73.63%.

TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZW and TSLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer