AMZW vs. SGOV
AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. AMZW is actively managed, while SGOV is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SGOV.
Performance
AMZW vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.52% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 9.45% | 7.33% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.52% | 2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and SGOV is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
AMZW
SGOV
AMZW vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZW | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 20.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 14.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 12.49 | -11.99 |
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and SGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -0.03% | -26.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | 0.00% | -9.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -0.00% | -8.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
AMZW vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.95% | 0.20% | +36.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.95% | 0.24% | +36.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.95% | 0.24% | +36.71% |
AMZW vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZW vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.29%, more than SGOV's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 42.29% | 25.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.86% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZW and SGOV have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.
AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 42.29%, compared with 3.86% for SGOV.
AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 0.09% for SGOV.
Find the right allocation for AMZW and SGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer