AMZW vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

AMZW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.16% return.

AMZW

• 1D: -3.13%
• 1M: -10.10%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 6M: 6.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	7.52%	7.33%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.16%	4.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZW and LQTI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

AMZW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZW	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.88	-0.44

Drawdowns

AMZW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZW	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-3.41%	-23.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.45%	-1.44%	-10.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	-0.88%	-8.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMZW	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.99%	5.10%	+31.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.99%	5.97%	+31.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.99%	5.97%	+31.02%

AMZW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.04%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	43.04%	25.29%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.11%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZW and LQTI in my portfolio?

AMZW and LQTI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMZW or LQTI?

On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZW or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZW or LQTI?

AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 43.04%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between AMZW and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 0.65% for LQTI.