AMZP vs. XLRI
AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Kurv, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
AMZP vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 8.15% return.
AMZP
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 4.51%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZP vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF | 4.51% | 2.64% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 8.15% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZP and XLRI is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZP vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
AMZP
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMZP vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZP | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZP vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZP | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -7.12% | -20.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.82% | 0.00% | -10.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -1.60% | -4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.26% | — | — |
Volatility
AMZP vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZP | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.59% | 11.25% | +19.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.19% | 11.25% | +15.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.19% | 11.25% | +15.94% |
AMZP vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZP vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.45%, more than XLRI's 13.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF | 19.45% | 22.04% | 15.15% | 2.45% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.56% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZP and XLRI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZP.
AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 19.45%, compared with 13.56% for XLRI.
AMZP is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZP and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for AMZP and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer