AMZP vs. XLRI
AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Kurv, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
AMZP vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 6.71% return.
AMZP
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -13.35%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- 11.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZP vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF | -2.19% | 2.64% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.71% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZP and XLRI is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZP vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
AMZP
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMZP vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZP | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZP vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZP | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -7.12% | -20.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.53% | -0.54% | -15.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -1.65% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.67% | — | — |
Volatility
AMZP vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZP | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.20% | 10.99% | +19.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 10.99% | +16.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 10.99% | +16.15% |
AMZP vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZP vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.90%, more than XLRI's 12.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF | 20.90% | 22.04% | 15.15% | 2.45% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.24% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZP and XLRI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZP.
AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 20.90%, compared with 12.24% for XLRI.
AMZP is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZP and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for AMZP and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer