PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZP vs. OCTQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZP vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AMZP

1D
-1.91%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
8.22%
6M
7.97%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZP vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZP vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZP
AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZP vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZPOCTQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.71

AMZP vs. OCTQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZPOCTQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

Drawdowns

AMZP vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and OCTQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZPOCTQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

0.00%

-27.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.65%

0.00%

-7.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

0.00%

-6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.15%

Volatility

AMZP vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZPOCTQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.99%

0.00%

+28.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.81%

0.00%

+26.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.81%

0.00%

+26.81%

AMZP vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZP vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison

AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.00%, while OCTQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF
19.00%22.04%15.15%2.45%
OCTQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, OCTQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZP.

AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 19.00%, compared with 0.00% for OCTQ.

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZP and 0.79% for OCTQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZP and OCTQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer