AMZP vs. APRH

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF) and APRH (Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZP returned 23.84% vs 8.03% for APRH. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRH.

Performance

AMZP vs. APRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly higher than APRH's 4.58% return.

AMZP

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -5.00%
• YTD: 8.22%
• 6M: 7.97%
• 1Y: 23.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRH

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 4.58%
• 6M: 3.99%
• 1Y: 8.03%
• 3Y*: 7.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZP vs. APRH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	8.22%	9.56%	37.42%	7.73%
APRH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April	4.58%	5.84%	6.91%	1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZP and APRH is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023	0.39

The correlation between AMZP and APRH shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMZP vs. APRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZP

AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 23
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 24
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

APRH

APRH Risk / Return Rank: 93
APRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
APRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
APRH Omega Ratio Rank: 97
APRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
APRH Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZP vs. APRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMZP	APRH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	3.27	-2.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	4.88	-3.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.93	-0.77
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.05	6.87	-5.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.71	23.39	-20.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMZP vs. APRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZP Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the APRH Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZP and APRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZP	APRH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	3.27	-2.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	1.71	-0.79

Drawdowns

AMZP vs. APRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than APRH's maximum drawdown of -5.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and APRH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZP	APRH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.36%	-5.87%	-21.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.64%	-1.21%	-22.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.65%	0.00%	-7.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.02%	-0.21%	-5.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.15%	0.36%	+8.79%

Volatility

AMZP vs. APRH - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) has a higher volatility of 8.11% compared to Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) at 0.58%. This indicates that AMZP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZP	APRH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.11%	0.58%	+7.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.00%	1.98%	+20.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.99%	2.48%	+26.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.81%	4.56%	+22.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.81%	4.56%	+22.25%

AMZP vs. APRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than APRH's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZP vs. APRH - Dividend Comparison

AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.00%, more than APRH's 5.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	19.00%	22.04%	15.15%	2.45%
APRH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April	5.35%	5.49%	6.87%	5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZP and APRH in my portfolio?

AMZP and APRH have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZP or APRH?

AMZP has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to APRH (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZP dropped -27.36% vs APRH's -5.87%.

Which ETF is better, AMZP or APRH?

On 1-year performance, AMZP leads with 23.84% vs 8.03% for APRH. On fees, APRH is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, APRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZP or APRH?

Over the 1-year period, AMZP has performed better with a 23.84% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZP or APRH?

APRH is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZP or APRH?

AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 19.00%, compared with 5.35% for APRH.

What is the main difference between AMZP and APRH?

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZP and 0.79% for APRH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.