AMZD.L vs. JEPG.L
AMZD.L (IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP) and JEPG.L (JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist)) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZD.L returned -8.10% vs 4.48% for JEPG.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZD.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPG.L.
Performance
AMZD.L vs. JEPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AMZD.L is traded in GBp, while JEPG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JEPG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZD.L achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than JEPG.L's -0.10% return.
AMZD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- 6M
- -8.49%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 1Y
- -8.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPG.L
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZD.L vs. JEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZD.L IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP | -7.00% | -2.75% | 20.52% |
JEPG.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist) | -0.10% | 4.41% | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZD.L and JEPG.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZD.L vs. JEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMZD.L
JEPG.L
AMZD.L vs. JEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZD.L | JEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.08 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.51 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 1.23 | -1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZD.L vs. JEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZD.L drawdown since its inception was -41.12%, which is greater than JEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD.L and JEPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZD.L | JEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.12% | -8.78% | -32.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.12% | -8.78% | -32.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.53% | -5.49% | -25.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -2.90% | -15.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.96% | 3.65% | +22.31% |
Volatility
AMZD.L vs. JEPG.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) has a higher volatility of 9.43% compared to JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JEPG.L) at 2.97%. This indicates that AMZD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZD.L | JEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.43% | 2.97% | +6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.46% | 7.89% | +15.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.59% | 10.38% | +41.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 11.37% | +31.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 11.37% | +31.78% |
AMZD.L vs. JEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZD.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZD.L vs. JEPG.L - Dividend Comparison
AMZD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.35%, more than JEPG.L's 8.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZD.L IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP | 18.35% | 14.03% | 2.37% |
JEPG.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 8.16% | 7.86% | 6.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZD.L and JEPG.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPG.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPG.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AMZD.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AMZD.L and 0.35% for JEPG.L.
Find the right allocation for AMZD.L and JEPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer